April 25, 2019

Regression, Not Reform: Why SB 1455, an attempted rewrite of virtual education, sets the cause backwards for kids and families

What’s a Rich Text element?

What’s a Rich Text element?

What’s a Rich Text element?

What’s a Rich Text element?

What’s a Rich Text element?
What’s a Rich Text element?

The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.

  1. testing number bullets
  2. and two
  3. and now threeee

Static and dynamic content editing

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

  • Testnig one bullet
  • two bullets
  • and now three

How to customize formatting for each rich text

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.

Compromise is the grease that makes our democracy work, but every time SB 1455 reveals a new “compromise” it gets worse for families.

Texas has long been in need of reform that increases educational options for families, but the most recent attempt – SB 1455 – is regression, not reform.

Unfortunately, the bill recently passed the Senate and is headed to the House. Parents across Texas will speak up in opposition of this regressive bill and fight for real reform in Texas.

Some of the unacceptable parts of this bill:

-A floor amendment in the Senate re-instituted the prohibition on K-2nd virtual education, meaning kids struggling in traditional schools will have to wait until 3rd grade before accessing this crucial educational option.

-Initially the bill took aim at removing the moratorium on new virtual schools, but substituted a new cap on enrollment that would eventually reduce enrollment increases to 2% each year. The clear result of this policy – which has no basis in good public policy – would be a growing wait list as families in need of virtual education are forced to wait to access their preferred educational option.

Texas Parent Shea Mackin, a national PSO board member and the chair of the Texas Coalition, had this to say on the bill: "Virtual education is an option important to all parents at every grade level. The lack of a virtual option for my 2nd grade child is one of the reasons I walk the halls of the Capitol every week as an advocate for public school options. SB 1455 continues the inexplicable prohibition on K-2nd virtual education and only allows a slow trickle of new students into virtual schools, when only 0.3% of all public school children attend virtual schools today. This bill is not reform, but regression. It will set the cause back and therefore I oppose it."

Back to Blog PostsBack to News PostsBack to News Posts